On Fri, 29 Jul 2016 21:31:28 +0200 deloptes <deloptes@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Julius Schwartzenberg wrote: > > > 2016-07-27 22:19 GMT+02:00 deloptes > > <deloptes@xxxxxxxxx>: > >> Lisi Reisz wrote: > >> > >>> On Wednesday 27 July 2016 17:48:41 iadest@xxxxx > >>> wrote: > >>>> Is it possible at all? > >>> That is the question I am asking!! > >>> > >> > >> I tried it running on raspberry 2 with 256MB of ram and it did not work. > > > > I ran KDE 3.5 on systems with 128MB RAM without problems. Maybe you > > need to allocate some swap, but this should at least work. > > > > I used KDE 1.x on a Cyrix 150+ which worked pretty fast. On a AMD K6-2 > > 333MHz I remember that KDE 2 and 3 felt sluggish compared to 1, but I > > do think I managed with them for a while on that system as well. I > > don't think Trinity would really work on those systems. What I > > remember KDE 1.x was more complete than many of the current light > > weight DEs. > > I just checked the raspberry yesterday - it has 512MB RAM. It has also > swap. Indeed it ran but it was so slowly that I render it unusable. The difference there might be ARM vs. x86, though. I've run one of the EXE Gnu/Linux Live CDs with TDE on an early Pentium III (550 MHz) with about the same amount of RAM, and it was usable, although programs were a bit slow to start. That might just be the CD drive, though. I haven't tried it on my 486 yet (and I'd have to do something about the busted serial port first, even if there's a compatible LiveCD). Maybe I should, just to see how bad it would really be. ;) E. Liddell --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: trinity-users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx For additional commands, e-mail: trinity-users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Read list messages on the web archive: http://trinity-users.pearsoncomputing.net/ Please remember not to top-post: http://trinity.pearsoncomputing.net/mailing_lists/#top-posting
