Michele Calgaro wrote: > Hi Emanoil, > I have no clue either. > I see two possible ways to proceed: > 1) have conditional compilation as discussed previously > 2) have two different version of tdebluetooth, one for bluez5 and one for > bluez4. Both have advantages and disadvantages. > As far as I am concerned you have the freedom to choose the way you think > is better/easier. Cheers > Michele Hi Michele, yes indeed these are the two options. 1) it would make sense if code/system would be maintained in the future. Given the all changes done KDE -> TDE, Qt -> TQt, dbus, bluez ... it would be the hell of conditionals in the code This is why I tend to go for option 2. In case of wheezy/bluez4 it would mean to port from KDE -> TDE (with some minor updates/corrections) For the rest/bluez5 the code needs to be changed to implement the bluez5 interface I'm just asking, so that I know how you see it thanks --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: trinity-devel-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx For additional commands, e-mail: trinity-devel-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Read list messages on the web archive: http://trinity-devel.pearsoncomputing.net/ Please remember not to top-post: http://trinity.pearsoncomputing.net/mailing_lists/#top-posting
