On Thu, 2015-03-12 at 10:58 -0700, Martin Lau wrote: > Old Title: Welcome to the TCP Instrumentation List > > On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 05:20:47PM -0500, rapier wrote: > > There should be two sets of instruments. Operational and diagnostic. The > > operation instruments will be be used to extend TCP_INFO and will always > > be available. Google will be providing a patch for upstream with 8 > > instruments in this category. The diagnostic instruments will be enabled > > by the user on an as needed basis. These data from these instruments > > will be stored in a separate structure that is referenced by a pointer > > in the socket or some other mechanism. The ability to only enable a > > subset of these instruments should be a design goal. > Can Google share which 8 fields will be added to TCP_INFO? > > Thanks, > --Martin > -- CC Eric Salo, who is working on this topic. Note that I upstreamed yesterday support for an unified socket cookie. http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/davem/net-next.git/commit/?id=33cf7c90fe2f97afb1cadaa0cfb782cb9d1b9ee2 _______________________________________________ Tcpinst-wg mailing list Tcpinst-wg@xxxxxxx https://lists.psc.edu/mailman/listinfo/tcpinst-wg To UNSUBSCRIBE visit https://lists.psc.edu/mailman/unsubscribe/tcpinst-wg