On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 10:04:28AM +0000, Chaitanya Kulkarni wrote:
> On 6/12/23 01:10, Lu Hongfei wrote:
> > The return value of the '==' or '!=' operator are bool, so there's
> > no need to convert it to bool again in iblock_execute_pr_out.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lu Hongfei <luhongfei@xxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/target/target_core_iblock.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/target/target_core_iblock.c b/drivers/target/target_core_iblock.c
> > index 254c33c9788e..ea42cb5d06d4
> > --- a/drivers/target/target_core_iblock.c
> > +++ b/drivers/target/target_core_iblock.c
> > @@ -889,7 +889,7 @@ static sense_reason_t iblock_execute_pr_out(struct se_cmd *cmd, u8 sa, u64 key,
> >
> > ret = ops->pr_preempt(bdev, key, sa_key,
> > scsi_pr_type_to_block(type),
> > - sa == PRO_PREEMPT ? false : true);
> > + sa != PRO_PREEMPT);
> > break;
> > case PRO_RELEASE:
> > if (!ops->pr_clear) {
>
> this not a fix as current code is not broken ..
It looks much better though. And it's easier to understand.
