On 3/15/23 5:54 PM, Mike Christie wrote: > However, are you saying that just adding the check is putting it on LIO core? > If so, we can always call check_stop_free in transport_cmd_check_stop_to_fabric. > The fabric driver's release_cmd then has to figure out what needs to be cleaned > up then. I can make that work. It's more complicated than just what I wrote > because of how isert handles failed cmds and tmrs, but it's doable. I missed the point of your mail before. CMD_T_STOP sucks so don't replicate it with another bit :) Agree with that :) I'll work on a patch like I described above.