From: Jinpeng Cui <cui.jinpeng2@xxxxxxxxxx> The implementation of strscpy() is more robust and safer. Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Jinpeng Cui <cui.jinpeng2@xxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/target/target_core_device.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/target/target_core_device.c b/drivers/target/target_core_device.c index b7f16ee8aa0e..0eec5a3217b9 100644 --- a/drivers/target/target_core_device.c +++ b/drivers/target/target_core_device.c @@ -809,10 +809,10 @@ struct se_device *target_alloc_device(struct se_hba *hba, const char *name) xcopy_lun->lun_tpg = &xcopy_pt_tpg; /* Preload the default INQUIRY const values */ - strlcpy(dev->t10_wwn.vendor, "LIO-ORG", sizeof(dev->t10_wwn.vendor)); - strlcpy(dev->t10_wwn.model, dev->transport->inquiry_prod, + strscpy(dev->t10_wwn.vendor, "LIO-ORG", sizeof(dev->t10_wwn.vendor)); + strscpy(dev->t10_wwn.model, dev->transport->inquiry_prod, sizeof(dev->t10_wwn.model)); - strlcpy(dev->t10_wwn.revision, dev->transport->inquiry_rev, + strscpy(dev->t10_wwn.revision, dev->transport->inquiry_rev, sizeof(dev->t10_wwn.revision)); return dev; -- 2.25.1
