On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 05:35:07AM -0600, Mike Christie wrote: > @@ -1132,14 +1127,8 @@ vhost_scsi_handle_vq(struct vhost_scsi *vs, struct vhost_virtqueue *vq) > * vhost_scsi_queue_data_in() and vhost_scsi_queue_status() > */ > cmd->tvc_vq_desc = vc.head; > - /* > - * Dispatch cmd descriptor for cmwq execution in process > - * context provided by vhost_scsi_workqueue. This also ensures > - * cmd is executed on the same kworker CPU as this vhost > - * thread to gain positive L2 cache locality effects. > - */ > - INIT_WORK(&cmd->work, vhost_scsi_submission_work); > - queue_work(vhost_scsi_workqueue, &cmd->work); > + target_queue_cmd_submit(tpg->tpg_nexus->tvn_se_sess, > + &cmd->tvc_se_cmd); > ret = 0; > err: > /* What about this aspect? Will things still stay on the same CPU? -- MST
