On 05/22/2019 08:04 AM, David Disseldorp wrote: > Hi, > > Some ABI changes went into libtcmu between v1.3.0 and v1.4.0 without a > corresponding .so version bump (e.g. 566c2ad5c8a). This breaks > dependency checking in some package managers, allowing for a v1.4.0 > tcmu-runner to be installed alongside a v1.3.0 libtcmu.so > > Should we consider adding a 2nd (minor) .so version number to libtcmu, > so that it can be bumped for backwards compatible ABI changes like this > one? > That seems ok to me.
