> -----Original Message----- > From: David Disseldorp [mailto:ddiss@xxxxxxx] > Sent: Friday, April 6, 2018 8:10 PM > To: Zhang Zhuoyu <zhangzhuoyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: nab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; target- > devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] target:separate tx/rx cmd_puds > > On Thu, 5 Apr 2018 13:12:12 +0200, David Disseldorp wrote: > > > > -CONFIGFS_ATTR_RO(target_stat_tgt_port_, in_cmds); > > > +CONFIGFS_ATTR_RO(target_stat_tgt_port_, tx_cmds); > > > +CONFIGFS_ATTR_RO(target_stat_tgt_port_, rx_cmds); > > > > I don't think the in_cmds metric should be deleted here. It could be > > calculated on the fly via tx_cmds + rx_cmds + nodata_cmds. > > @Zhang Zhuoyu: How about something like the following? > https://git.samba.org/?p=ddiss/linux.git;a=commitdiff;h=73723ccf433424721 > 830797d70cfb88d4596e0fc > Mmm... This patch is much better. Looks good to me. Zhuoyu > ...this keeps the in_cmds metric, and renames tx/rx_cmds read/write_cmds > respectively. read/write_cmds is still a bit ambiguous, as it refers to the > command data direction rather than SCSI READ/WRITE CDBs, but IMO it's > clearer, and more consistent with the read/write_mbytes metrics. > > Cheers, David -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe target-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
