On Fri, 2018-03-23 at 18:36 +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> There are a few functions which check for if the lock is held
> (spin_lock_assert()) and the interrupts are disabled (irqs_disabled()).
> > From looking at the code, each function is static, the caller is near by
>
> and does spin_lock_irq|safe(). As Linus puts it:
>
> > It's not like this is some function that is exported to random users,
> > and we should check that the calling convention is right.
> >
> > This looks like "it may have been useful during coding to document
> > things, but it's not useful long-term".
>
> Remove those checks.
Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@xxxxxxx>
��.n��������+%������w��{.n����j� ����{ay� ʇڙ���f���h������_�(�階�ݢj"��������G����?���&��
