Hey MNC, Apologies for the delayed follow up. On Tue, 2017-12-19 at 04:03 -0600, Mike Christie wrote: > The following patches were made over Linus's tree > and my tcmu update here > > https://www.spinics.net/lists/target-devel/msg16283.html > > The first patch prevents possible corruption with buggy tcmu userspace > apps. The other 4 patches allow tcmu apps to restart themselves while > IO is being executed. This is needed for management operations like > updating the app and handling crashes. Thanks. The prerequisites where applied earlier this week, including patch #1-#3 from this series. > > The last four patches are an update to this RFC: > https://www.spinics.net/lists/target-devel/msg16312.html > Since that posting I moved the files being added to a new > dir "action" which is used for special files that execute > a kernel function that does more than just set a param/attrib > that is exported from the same file. > Was wondering about that.. Why shouldn't these be added as backend device specific configfs attributes, similar to what tcmu does for tcmu_attrib_attrs[]..? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe target-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
