On Tue, 2018-01-09 at 10:17 -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 07:04:16PM +0200, Max Gurtovoy wrote:
> > hi Guys,
> > did we forget taking this fix to mainline/stable or we found another
> > solution ?
>
> I thought it was going to NAB's tree.. My mistake, I put it back into
> patchworks and it will get into for-next
In fairness, the email thread said exactly that. But, it never got
picked up by NAB. And being that it's in our tree and calling an rdma-
core function, it can easily enough go through our tree, so I applied it
to for-rc.
--
Doug Ledford <dledford@xxxxxxxxxx>
GPG KeyID: B826A3330E572FDD
Key fingerprint = AE6B 1BDA 122B 23B4 265B 1274 B826 A333 0E57 2FDDAttachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
