On 06/30/2017 02:31 AM, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > Hey MNC, > > On Mon, 2017-06-12 at 01:43 -0500, Mike Christie wrote: >> On 06/11/2017 04:02 PM, Mike Christie wrote: >>> On 06/09/2017 01:11 AM, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: >>>> Hi Bryant & Co, >>>> >>>> On Tue, 2017-06-06 at 09:28 -0500, Bryant G. Ly wrote: >>>>> From: "Bryant G. Ly" <bgly@xxxxxxxxxx> >>>>> >>>>> This patch consists of adding a netlink to allow for reconfiguration >>>>> of a device in tcmu. >>>>> >>>>> It also changes and adds some attributes that are reconfigurable: >>>>> write_cache, device size, and device path. >>>>> >>>>> V2 - Fixes kfree in tcmu: Make dev_config configurable >>>>> V3 - Fixes spelling error >>>>> V4 - change strcpy to strlcpy for tcmu_dev_path_store and move >>>>> tcmu_reconfig_type into target_core_user.h >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Bryant G. Ly (5): >>>>> tcmu: Support emulate_write_cache >>>>> tcmu: Add netlink for device reconfiguration >>>>> tcmu: Make dev_size configurable via userspace >>>>> tcmu: Make dev_config configurable >>>>> tcmu: Add Type of reconfig into netlink >>>>> >>>>> drivers/target/target_core_user.c | 152 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- >>>>> include/uapi/linux/target_core_user.h | 9 ++ >>>>> 2 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) >>>>> >>>> >>>> AFAICT, it looks like all of the review comments have been addressed in >>>> -v4. >>>> >>>> Applied to target-pending/for-next, with MNC's (pseudo) Reviewed-by's >>>> added for #3-#5. >>>> >>>> Please let me know if anything else needs to be changed. >>>> >>> >>> The patches look ok. Thanks. Could you just merge the attached patch >>> into "[PATCH v4 5/5] tcmu: Add Type of reconfig into netlink" or into >>> the patchset after it? It just makes some of the names a little less >>> generic and only returns the reconfig attr for reconfig commands. >>> >> >> Actually Nick, do not merge the last patch. I have a lot more fixes/changes. >> >> Bryant, could you test and adapt your userspace patches for the attached >> patch build over Nicks for-next branch. >> >> Basically, the patch just has use pass the value being reconfigured with >> the netlink event. Along the way, it fixes a couple bugs. >> >> Nick, when we have tested the patch, then I can submit as a formal >> patchset, or you can fold into the existing patches or whatever you prefer. >> > > Looking at merging your -v4 patches series here next: > > [PATCH V4 00/10] target/tcmu: make tcmu netlink ops sync > http://www.spinics.net/lists/target-devel/msg15706.html > > Do you still want me to drop the patch from Bryant below as mentioned > earlier..? Hey, First, sorry for the mess of comments/patches in various threads. No need to drop it. The first patch: [PATCH 01/10] tcmu: reconfigure netlink attr changes in the thread you referenced above just fixes the stuff that needed to be fixed. > > tcmu: Add Type of reconfig into netlink > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/nab/target-pending.git/commit/?h=for-next&id=28d44b983000754677155e46f6bdafc7b4d84213 > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe target-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
