Re: remove REQ_OP_WRITE_SAME

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Christoph,

> Now that we are using REQ_OP_WRITE_ZEROES for all zeroing needs in the
> kernel there is very little use left for REQ_OP_WRITE_SAME.  We only
> have two callers left, and both just export optional protocol features
> to remote systems: DRBD and the target code.

While I'm not particularly married to WRITE SAME, I do think it's a
shame that the RAID5/6 code never started using it. It does make a
difference when initializing RAID sets.

The other thing that keeps me a bit on the fence is that a bunch of the
plumbing to handle a bio with a payload different from bi_size is needed
for the copy offload token. I'm hoping to have those patches ready for
4.13. Right now there are a bunch of places where handling of
REQ_OP_COPY_IN and REQ_OP_COPY_OUT share conditionals with WRITE SAME.

So I suggest postponing the decision about whether to rip out WRITE SAME
until I finish the token stuff.

-- 
Martin K. Petersen	Oracle Linux Engineering
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe target-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux SCSI]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux