On Fri, 2017-02-10 at 06:11 +0000, Bart Van Assche wrote: > On Thu, 2017-02-09 at 22:01 -0800, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > > BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000001 > > It seems like I accidentally sent the wrong version of patch 6 to the list: > in target_handle_abort(), if (cmd->se_cmd_flags & SCF_SCSI_TMR_CDB) should > have been if (!(cmd->se_cmd_flags & SCF_SCSI_TMR_CDB)). > Does that mean no basic first order scenarios where tested with this series..? As requested in last night, I'd like to have the testing for each series described in the cover letter: - Was active I/O shutdown tested..? - Which TMRs and how many times they where triggered..? - How many volumes where tested concurrently..? - With what workload..? - With what types of hosts..? - How many nodes where used..? - And for how long did the test run..? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe target-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
