On Thu, 2017-02-09 at 17:42 -0800, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> The -v4 patch was using doing a lun lookup from within
> core_tmr_abort_task() when !se_tmr->tmr_dev that could trigger a
> deadlock.
>
> But this patch doesn't seem to do any lookup at all for
> TARGET_SCF_IGNORE_TMR_LUN when !se_tmr->tmr_dev..?
>
> Is that correct..?
Yes.
A quote from the cover letter of v5 of this patch series: "Left out
the transport_lookup_tmr_lun() call from core_tmr_abort_task() in
patch "Make it possible to specify I_T nexus for SCSI abort"."
Bart.��.n��������+%������w��{.n����j� ����{ay� ʇڙ���f���h������_�(�階�ݢj"��������G����?���&��
