On 12/23/16, 12:47 AM, "Bart Van Assche" <Bart.VanAssche@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>This patch needs a more detailed description. There are many changes in this
>patch. What changes are the changes that prevent the NULL pointer dereference?
>What changes (if any) were made as the result of code inspection?
We saw this stack trace on one test setup which never was reproduced.
This patch is result of code inspection only and we have not seen this being
Reproduced or reported by customer.
��.n��������+%������w��{.n����j� ����{ay� ʇڙ���f���h������_�(�階�ݢj"��������G����?���&��
