Dynamic debug has same messages. I copy one round from them: [ 881.979010] entering iscsi_target_do_login_rx, conn: ffff881fcf74b000, kworker/15:1:491 [ 881.979017] iSCSI Parameter updated to IFMarker=No [ 881.979017] Reset "IFMarker" to "No". [ 881.979018] iSCSI Parameter updated to OFMarker=No [ 881.979018] Reset "OFMarker" to "No". [ 881.979019] Reset "IFMarkInt" to "Irrelevant". [ 881.979065] Starting login_timer for kworker/15:1/491 [ 881.979075] Reset "OFMarker" to "No". [ 881.979075] iSCSI Parameter updated to IFMarkInt=Irrelevant [ 881.979076] Reset "IFMarkInt" to "Irrelevant". [ 881.979076] iSCSI Parameter updated to OFMarkInt=Irrelevant [ 881.979077] Reset "OFMarkInt" to "Irrelevant". [ 881.979078] No response for proposed key "RDMAExtensions". [ 881.979129] iSCSI Parameter updated to OFMarker=No [ 881.979130] Reset "OFMarker" to "No". [ 881.979131] iSCSI Parameter updated to IFMarkInt=Irrelevant [ 881.979132] Reset "IFMarkInt" to "Irrelevant". [ 881.979133] iSCSI Parameter updated to OFMarkInt=Irrelevant [ 881.979135] Reset "OFMarkInt" to "Irrelevant". [ 881.979186] iSCSI Parameter updated to OFMarker=No [ 881.979186] Reset "OFMarker" to "No". [ 881.979186] iSCSI Parameter updated to IFMarkInt=Irrelevant [ 881.979187] Reset "IFMarkInt" to "Irrelevant". [ 881.979187] iSCSI Parameter updated to OFMarkInt=Irrelevant [ 881.979190] No response for proposed key "RDMAExtensions". [ 881.979243] iSCSI Parameter updated to OFMarker=No [ 881.979244] Reset "OFMarker" to "No". [ 881.979244] iSCSI Parameter updated to IFMarkInt=Irrelevant [ 881.979245] Reset "IFMarkInt" to "Irrelevant". [ 881.979245] iSCSI Parameter updated to OFMarkInt=Irrelevant [ 881.979246] Reset "OFMarkInt" to "Irrelevant". [ 881.979296] Starting login_timer for kworker/15:1/491 [ 881.979304] Reset "OFMarker" to "No". [ 881.979305] iSCSI Parameter updated to IFMarkInt=Irrelevant [ 881.979305] Reset "IFMarkInt" to "Irrelevant". [ 881.979306] iSCSI Parameter updated to OFMarkInt=Irrelevant [ 881.979308] No response for proposed key "RDMAExtensions". [ 881.979357] Reset "OFMarker" to "No". [ 881.979358] iSCSI Parameter updated to IFMarkInt=Irrelevant [ 881.979358] Reset "IFMarkInt" to "Irrelevant". [ 881.979359] iSCSI Parameter updated to OFMarkInt=Irrelevant [ 881.979359] Reset "OFMarkInt" to "Irrelevant". [ 881.979360] No response for proposed key "RDMAExtensions". [ 881.979412] No response for proposed key "RDMAExtensions". [ 881.979412] No response for proposed key "InitiatorRecvDataSegmentLength". [ 881.979413] No response for proposed key "TargetRecvDataSegmentLength". [ 881.979413] Sending Login Response, Flags: 0x04, ITT: 0x00000000, ExpCmdSN; 0x00000001, MaxCmdSN: 0x00000001, StatSN: 0xdd8719c0, Length: 0 [ 881.979454] entering iscsi_target_do_login_rx, conn: ffff881fcf74b000, kworker/15:1:491 [ 881.979468] No response for proposed key "RDMAExtensions". [ 881.979468] No response for proposed key "InitiatorRecvDataSegmentLength". [ 881.979469] No response for proposed key "TargetRecvDataSegmentLength". [ 881.979469] Sending Login Response, Flags: 0x04, ITT: 0x00000000, ExpCmdSN; 0x00000001, MaxCmdSN: 0x00000001, StatSN: 0xdd8719c1, Length: 0 [ 881.979480] systemd-journald[1002]: /dev/kmsg buffer overrun, some messages lost. Any idea, what could be useful in dynamic debug ? Thanks, Laszlo > On 07 Aug 2016, at 19:26, Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > >> On Aug 7, 2016, at 1:21 PM, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >>> I have used the LIO target for years without any problem. >>> This week I wanted to use from an Oracle Solaris 11.3 operating system. >> >> You mean you used a solaris as the iser initiator? >> I'm not sure I follow... >> >>> When I start the discovery from Solaris 11 I got the following messages in dmesg >>> >>> [42165.515175] iSCSI Login timeout on Network Portal 0.0.0.0:3260 >>> [42165.516149] iSCSI Login negotiation failed. >>> >>> and a flood of these messages: >>> [35972.928304] No response for proposed key "RDMAExtensions". >>> [35972.928304] No response for proposed key "InitiatorRecvDataSegmentLength". >>> [35972.928304] No response for proposed key "TargetRecvDataSegmentLength”. >>> >>> I suspect that I need to set these parameters on my target side, to be able to use it from solaris side. >> >> This looks like you asked for iSER (RDMAExtensions=yes) but didn't set >> them as negotiable but rather declarative? >> >> See https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-storm-iser-15#section-6.3 >> >> Can you turn on dynamic debug se we can see some more relevant >> info? >> >>> Does anyone has experience to use LIO target from Solaris initiator ? >> >> Not that I'm aware of... >> >> Maybe Chuck knows (CC'd)? > > I've never tried using the Solaris block protocol drivers, > but maybe Shirley or John has. > > > -- > Chuck Lever > > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe target-devel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe target-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
