The new RW API will need this.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Steve Wise <swise@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
I'm not opposed to this change but traditionally QPs are bound to a
device not to a single port.
Right, this was done because rdma_protocol_iwarp takes a port number.
I think we discussed this once, the core code doesn't actually support
different protocols on different ports, so the port_num argument to
rdma_protocol_iwarp is redundant.
This all starts to look really goofy when multi-port APM is used and
the QP's port number changes dynamically at runtime. (I have some
experimental patches that do that), I'd rather see all the port_num
stuff in this series go away. :(
HCH and I complained about this per-port distinction in several private
conversations. I'd really love to see it go away too.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe target-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
