On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 11:30:32AM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > Right, this was done because rdma_protocol_iwarp takes a port number. > > I think we discussed this once, the core code doesn't actually support > different protocols on different ports, so the port_num argument to > rdma_protocol_iwarp is redundant. > > This all starts to look really goofy when multi-port APM is used and > the QP's port number changes dynamically at runtime. (I have some > experimental patches that do that), I'd rather see all the port_num > stuff in this series go away. :( Reall, I would _love_ to kill all that port_num crap. But until we get agreement from Doug and all the core maintainers that we can kill it from the core, and that multi-protocol devices are indeed as silly as they seem I can't.. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe target-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
