On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 09:45:40AM -0600, Steve Wise wrote: > > > +static inline bool rdma_has_read_invalidate(struct ib_device *dev, u32 port_num) > > > > Is rdma_device_sup_read_inv() a better name? > > or rdma_dev_supports_read_inv() I looked at the naming and I think a rdma_device_* or rdma_dev_* is simplify wrong - per the official decree we can support different protocols on different ports, and that's why we also pass the port_num to this function. How about rdma_cap_read_inv? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe target-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
