Re: [PATCH for-next 10/10] IB/iser: Support the remote invalidation exception

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 17/11/2015 10:05, Or Gerlitz wrote:
On 11/16/2015 6:37 PM, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
+            if (iser_task->dir[ISER_DIR_IN])
+                reg = &iser_task->rdma_reg[ISER_DIR_IN];
+            else
+                reg = &iser_task->rdma_reg[ISER_DIR_OUT];

and what happens with bidirectional commands?!

It won't work, iSER lacks support for bidirectional commands for as
long as I'm involved with it and until we either decide that we care
enough to implement it both in the target and initiator sides or some
array with iser bidi support shows up I don't know how much its worth
our attention.

Thoughts?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe target-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux SCSI]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux