Re: [PATCH for-next 04/10] IB/iser: set intuitive values for mr_valid

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 17/11/2015 09:43, Or Gerlitz wrote:
On 11/16/2015 6:37 PM, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
This parameter is described as "is mr valid indicator".
In other words, it indicates whether memory registration
is valid or not. So intuitive values would be:
mr_valid=True, when memory registration is valid and
mr_valid=False otherwise.

and what was there before? the other way around?

on what cases the indicator is false (with the new semantics)?

This is just an attempt to fix the confusing semantics I gave these
flags. If the MR is valid it needs invalidation, that's it...


Also, we have a convention of starting commit titles with capital
letters, please follow on that "Set iser [...]"

Will fix...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe target-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux SCSI]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux