On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 08:21:56AM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote: > >Shouldn't this be a single uninterruptible wait? > > Uninterruptible waits show up in the CPU load which is what I wanted to > avoid. This can indeed be changed into a single uninterruptible wait. Do you > perhaps prefer the latter ? I don't think this hack is worth it just to optimize the load avg calculation. If you really are about it deeply enough propose a change to add a new task state that isn't interruptible but still doesn't count towards the load avg. Wait, isn't io_schedule() doing just that? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe target-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
