On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 12:13:32PM -0700, Andy Grover wrote: > Even though qla2xxx and qla2xxx_npiv are not represented hierarchically in > configfs (they're peers) I'm wondering if that's not actually a mistake, and > preferable to present differently in targetcli. It might be clearer to show > it hierarchically -- create an "npivs" node: > > qla2xxx > o- 20:00:00:00:00:00:00:55 > o- acls > o- luns > o- npivs > > in which "npivs/ create 5555666677778888 npiv_wwnn=1111222233334444" > > would actually jump over to the qla2xxx_npiv configfs dir and set stuff up. Or the qla2xxx_npiv configfs dir should go away in this form and we should just have the npivs subdirectories? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe target-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
