On 12/1/2014 7:50 PM, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
Thus in order to avoid a NULL dereference in cma_id->qp->qp_context we destroy the qp after we destroy the cm_id (and make the dereference safe).
Wouldn't it be more correct to reverse the order between this patch and the preceding one?
-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe target-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
