Re: qla2xxx crashing kernel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> The problem I am faced with is something is causing the kernel to crash and
> there aren't any zero-length commands after the Report LUNs command.

You say there are no zero-length commands, but...

> Here's the details from the protocol analyzer of the crash with a few
> comments thrown in.  Note the only exchange after the large Report LUNs
> command does not appear to be a zero-length command.

...

> After this exchange, the LIO target unit no longer responds to the initiator
> as shown by the trace lines below, because the Linux kernel has crashed.
>
> Eventually the Initiator logs off the link (LOGO) at time index
> 00:52.254_510_372
>
>        00:41.006_592_808    141.916        FC Port(1:1:1) FC4Cmd
> Test Unit Ready; LUN = 0x0000; FCP_DL = 0x00000000;            68    0000EF
> 0000E8    0000    0008 FFFF    0000    Originator; First_Sequence;
> End_Sequence; Transfer Sequence Initiative;     00000000            1EDFA836
> (Correct)    EOFt(-)
>        00:44.191_823_484 3185230.676    FC Port(1:1:1) ABTS
> ABTS; Basic Link Service; Abort Exchange;                    36    0000EF
> 0000E8        0008    FFFF 0000    Originator; End_Sequence; Transfer
> Sequence Initiative;                 EA3CE37F    (Correct)    EOFt(+)

Here clearly the initiator clearly *does* send a zero-length command
(TEST UNIT READY), and the target does not respond.  The logical
conclusion is that *this* is the command that crashes the target,
since the target handle the previous INQUIRY command just fine, and
we're not responding to any commands after a panic.

And indeed, I have a theory about what is happening: I suspect the
initiator is sending a TEST UNIT READY command with the "WRDATA" bit
set, so that the target core treats it as a command with a data-out
phase (transferring data from the initiator), but with a data length
of 0.  Unfortunately I don't see any indication of the value of WRDATA
in your trace.  Looking at the target code, I think it does not handle
this correctly, even in the latest upstream code.  I have a local
patch that I thought was upstream that I'll send shortly.

 - R.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe target-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux SCSI]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux