[PATCH 02/10] target: remove some smp_mb__after_atomic()s

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



atomic_inc_return() already does an implicit memory barrier and the
second case was moved from an atomic to a plain flag operation.  If a
barrier were needed in the second case, it would have to be smp_mb(),
not a variant optimized away for x86 and other architectures.

Signed-off-by: Joern Engel <joern@xxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/target/target_core_transport.c | 2 --
 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/target/target_core_transport.c b/drivers/target/target_core_transport.c
index 7fa62fc93e0b..0b43761ed85f 100644
--- a/drivers/target/target_core_transport.c
+++ b/drivers/target/target_core_transport.c
@@ -1166,7 +1166,6 @@ transport_check_alloc_task_attr(struct se_cmd *cmd)
 	 * Dormant to Active status.
 	 */
 	cmd->se_ordered_id = atomic_inc_return(&dev->dev_ordered_id);
-	smp_mb__after_atomic();
 	pr_debug("Allocated se_ordered_id: %u for Task Attr: 0x%02x on %s\n",
 			cmd->se_ordered_id, cmd->sam_task_attr,
 			dev->transport->name);
@@ -2896,7 +2895,6 @@ void transport_send_task_abort(struct se_cmd *cmd)
 		if (cmd->se_tfo->write_pending_status(cmd) != 0) {
 			cmd->transport_state |= CMD_T_ABORTED;
 			cmd->se_cmd_flags |= SCF_SEND_DELAYED_TAS;
-			smp_mb__after_atomic();
 			return;
 		}
 	}
-- 
2.0.0.rc0.1.g7b2ba98

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe target-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux SCSI]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux