Thanks Roland, My response is inline below. -Regards Devesh -----Original Message----- From: roland@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:roland@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Roland Dreier Sent: Saturday, March 08, 2014 1:02 AM To: Devesh Sharma Cc: Nicholas A. Bellinger; Or Gerlitz; Hefty Sean; linux-rdma; Martin K. Petersen; target-devel; Sagi Grimberg; linux-kernel Subject: Re: linux rdma 3.14 merge plans Sure, no problem. Do you have a git tree with the latest versions of all the changes you want for 3.15 in a branch? That would be helpful as I catch up on applying things, so that I don't miss anything. [DS]: Yes, I do have a cloned copy of your git tree migrated to for-next branch, with all the patches we have submitted to linux-rdma (patch series: [PATCH for-next 00/17] ocrdma driver code sync-up). However, it is on my local server. In case of urgency (and if OFED EWG permits me) I can set it up on benay dot openfabrics dot org, for now and give a link to pull. If you don't have one, taking a little time to set one up on github or wherever would be nice. You can base your set of changes on Linus's latest tree. [DS]: Currently we do not have such tree. I will have to discuss within my organization on how to go about this request. Thanks! Roland On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 9:07 PM, Devesh Sharma <Devesh.Sharma@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Roland, > > Is it okay to send next series of patches even if previous series is not accepted yet in your tree? Off-course I will cut patches on top of previous series of patches. > > -Regards > Devesh > > -----Original Message----- > From: linux-rdma-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:linux-rdma-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Nicholas A. > Bellinger > Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2014 12:34 AM > To: Roland Dreier > Cc: Or Gerlitz; Hefty Sean; linux-rdma; Martin K. Petersen; > target-devel; Sagi Grimberg; linux-kernel > Subject: Re: linux rdma 3.14 merge plans > > On Wed, 2014-03-05 at 07:18 -0800, Roland Dreier wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 1:54 AM, Nicholas A. Bellinger >> <nab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > That all said, do you have an objection wrt taking this bits >> > through target-pending..? Given the dependencies involved, that >> > would seem the most logical path to take. >> >> Perhaps not surprisingly, I would prefer to get a chance to review a >> major change to the core RDMA midlayer rather than having you merge >> it through your tree. So yes I do object. Please give me a chance >> to review and merge it. I am working on that this week. >> > > Great. We'll be looking for a response by the end of the week. > > Otherwise if you end up not having time, we'd still like to move forward for v3.15 given the amount of review the series has already gotten on the list. > > Thank you, > > --nab > > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" > in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo > info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe target-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
