On Wed, 19 June 2013 12:27:37 -1000, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > No the warning is correct, the SCSI target code needs to be fixed. You > cannot call spin_unlock_bh with interrupts disabled. That sounds like something coverity could be taught with reasonable effort - if someone from them is listening. Not sure if sparse has enough context to do the same. Just to play thick and make things ultra-clear, you say the following pattern is never legal, correct? spin_lock_irq(save) ... spin_lock_bh ... spin_unlock_bh ... spin_unlock_irq(restore) > So fix the code, don't weaken the warning. Will do. Jörn -- The only real mistake is the one from which we learn nothing. -- John Powell -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe target-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html