Re: [PATCHv2 0/12] target_core_pr.c cleanups

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2013-05-16 at 10:40 -0700, Andy Grover wrote:
> Changes from v1:
> * Drop #4 "Only return 0 or -err from core_scsi3_check_implicit_release"
> * Split up #10 (9 and 10 in this series)
> * #13 "Add upcall to save aptpl state" held back for separate discussion
> 

So I'm mostly OK with these. 

The one exception is with patch #12, which given the NAK on the upcall
junk doesn't make sense to apply as is.

>From now on I'm going to be alot more strict is taking changes like this
that are only compile tested, given the number of regressions in the
past that have come up from your changes.  Can you please share how
you've been testing these changes, specifically the aptpl bits..?

Also, I'll not be applying these before rebasing target-pending/for-next
to -rc2 next week.

--nab

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe target-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux SCSI]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux