On 12/21/12 10:58 AM, "Mark Rustad" <mark.d.rustad@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>The following patches make changes to the PRLI response
>when tcm_fc is present. One patch clears the retry
>capability when a target is available. The other
>modifies the returned role to clear the target
>role when no target is provided to the node issuing
>the PRLI.
>
>Are these changes right? Are they complete, or are
>they maybe just a step in the right direction?
>
>These arose from issues that Bhanu was seeing. He
>has run these a bit, as have I, but they have not
>yet been through any serious validation. I thought
>it best to get more eyes on these before we go too
>far in validating that may not be right.
>
>---
>
>Mark Rustad (2):
> tcm_fc: Do not report target role when target is not defined
> tcm_fc: Do not indicate retry capability to initiators
>
>
> drivers/target/tcm_fc/tfc_sess.c | 12 +++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Hmm. Still no response at all on these patches. I really would like a
little feedback on them.
--
Mark Rustad, LAN Access Division, Intel Corporation
��.n��������+%������w��{.n����j� ����{ay� ʇڙ���f���h������_�(�階�ݢj"��������G����?���&��
