Hello, First, thanks for this great project! We have been using the FC target for a few months now for KVM disk IO scalability analysis, and it has been a great resource for us! We're able to do >1.4 M IOPS with multiple VMs via PCI-pass-through, and we're now testing virtio scalability enhancements, so it's been an incredibly useful feature for us! We are now trying to create a test-bed with FCoE, with only FCoE targets and initiators (no FCF's). For the moment, I am trying a directly-connected 82599EB adapters from two systems (one the target, the other the initiator). These interfaces are configured for IP and ping-able. I created vn2vn FC ports and I now have 1 fc_host per system. I have created a target on one via targetcli with a single LUN: > /> ls > o- / ......................................................................................................... [...] > o- backstores .............................................................................................. [...] > | o- block .................................................................................... [0 Storage Object] > | o- fileio ................................................................................... [1 Storage Object] > | | o- lun1 ..................................................................... [/tmp/lun1.img (1.0G) activated] > | o- pscsi .................................................................................... [0 Storage Object] > o- loopback ........................................................................................... [0 Target] > o- tcm_fc ............................................................................................. [1 Target] > o- 20:00:00:1b:21:4b:0a:0e ........................................................................... [enabled] > o- acls .............................................................................................. [1 ACL] > | o- 20:00:00:1b:21:67:5f:2a .................................................................. [1 Mapped LUN] > | o- mapped_lun1 ................................................................... [lun1 fileio/lun1 (rw)] > o- luns .............................................................................................. [1 LUN] > o- lun1 ...................................................................... [fileio/lun1 (/tmp/lun1.img)] The initiator has a port name of 0x2000001b21675f2a and both target and initiator ports are "Online". However, after re-scanning for devices, the initiator does not find any new LUNs. I tried to do a fcping, but I can only successfully ping a FC ID, and not a port name: > [root@spv-21 ~]# fcping -c 3 -h eth6 -F 0x000a0e > sending echo to 0xA0E > echo 1 accepted 0.468 ms > echo 2 accepted 0.428 ms > echo 3 accepted 0.462 ms > 3 frames sent, 3 received 0 errors, 0.000% loss, avg. rt time 0.453 ms > [root@spv-21 ~]# fcping -h eth6 -N 0x2000001b214b0a0e > GID_NN error: Invalid argument > cannot find fcid of destination @ wwnn 0x2000001B214B0A0E I am wondering if there's still a connectivity problem. [Not knowing much about the world of FC] Is there some sort of wwnn-to-fcid mapping that I am missing? Or maybe something else? Thanks, -Andrew -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe target-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
