Re: Target_Core - Expected Transfer Length

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2012-03-28 at 14:14 +0200, Stefan Gourguis wrote:
> Hello List,
> 
> Today i got a lot of Errors on Lio for my FC connected ESX5 Host:
> 
> dmesg:
> [82877.603460] MODE SENSE: unimplemented page/subpage: 0x1c/0x00
> [82925.231612] TARGET_CORE[qla2xxx]: Expected Transfer Length: 2312 does not match SCSI CDB Length: 2056 for SAM Opcode: 0xa0
> [82925.231632] Status CTIO7: ffff880260153880
> [82925.232150] TARGET_CORE[qla2xxx]: Expected Transfer Length: 511 does not match SCSI CDB Length: 255 for SAM Opcode: 0x12
> [82925.232164] Status CTIO7: ffff880260153900
> [82925.242319] TARGET_CORE[qla2xxx]: Expected Transfer Length: 292 does not match SCSI CDB Length: 36 for SAM Opcode: 0x12
> [82925.242332] Status CTIO7: ffff880260153a00
> 

Hi again Stefan,

This means the Fibre Channel (fabric) level expected transfer length
(EDTL) does not match the length extracted from the SCSI CDB.  This
usually means there is a bug between the SCSI driver and SCSI subsystem
on the client host OS, so target_core_mod uses the SCSI CDB length
presented values (eg: the smaller of the two)

It's safe to considered these warnings for control type SCSI CDBs.

--nab

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe target-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux SCSI]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux