Re: [PATCH 3/4] target/core: add unknown size flag to target_submit_cmd()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Roland Dreier | 2012-02-23 09:54:23 [-0800]:

>> @@ -522,6 +523,7 @@ struct se_cmd {
>>        /* Used to signal cmd->se_tfo->check_release_cmd() usage per cmd */
>>        unsigned                check_release:1;
>>        unsigned                cmd_wait_set:1;
>> +       unsigned                unknown_data_length:1;
>>        /* See se_cmd_flags_table */
>>        u32                     se_cmd_flags;
>>        u32                     se_ordered_id;
>
>why do we need this unknown_data_length member?  As far
>as I can see from Nic's tree (which has the usb-gadget fabric
>driver merged up), the only place it is used is in this one function.
Yes, there is only one user of it.

>Why not just do
>
>        if (flags & TARGET_SCF_UNKNOWN_SIZE)
>                cmd->data_length = size;
>
>at the end and avoid the obfuscation?  Is there some other
>use for this member planned?
I don't think so. The new firewire target can probably deal without it.
Nic did not complain about it. The alternative would be to pass flags
additionally to transport_generic_allocate_tasks() and
transport_generic_cmd_sequencer() to have it here _or_ introduce
SCF_UNKNOWN_SIZE so we can grab this flag from se_cmd_flags. Either way
I'm fine with both ways if you want to get rid of unknown_data_length.

> - R.

Sebastian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe target-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux SCSI]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux