ping? On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 03:52:11PM -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > I'd like to get some comments on the approach on how to move error > handling out from the transport processing thread. > > Just like I/O submission all EH callers actually are from process > context and can block. But given how long EH can take I'd rather not > push it into that context as it might end up blocking other LUs > from making progress. It seems like having a dedicated EH context > for each LU, just like we do in the Linux SCSI midlayer would be > appronpinquate here. > > What makes our life even easier is that there is only one TMF > implemented in the target core right now, the LUN reset. Given > the nature of a LUN reset there is no real reason to ever process > multiple of those at the same time. Can we simply fail a second > LUN RESET while the first one is in progress, or do we have to > complete them all once the reset is done? > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe target-devel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html ---end quoted text--- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe target-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
