Re: soft lockup in the target processing thread

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/12/2011 03:09 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
Running the current master tree I reproducibly get the following
softlockup when running xfstests 078 on a tcm_loop/iblock device:

[  968.113575] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 22s! [LIO_iblock:2133]
[  968.116635] CPU 0
[  968.116635]
[  968.116635] Pid: 2133, comm: LIO_iblock Not tainted 3.2.0-rc4+ #76 Bochs Bochs

On my machine I see:

F S   UID   PID  PPID  C PRI  NI ADDR SZ WCHAN  TTY          TIME CMD
5 S     0     7     2  0 -40   - -     0 watchd ?        00:00:00 watchdog/0
1 S     0   747     2  0  80   0 -     0 transp ?        00:00:00 LIO_fileio

so the watchdog thread has a higher priority compared to LIO_'s worker
thread. I don't see any locks which are hold within
transport_processing_thread() for a long time. That means that you
should be re-scheduled at least between taking a new work item. Is this
a NON-PREEMPT config?

Sebastian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe target-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux SCSI]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux