On 09/20/2011 05:14 AM, Jerome Martin wrote: > Hello Ritesh, > > On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 12:31 PM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf <rrs@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 12:05 PM, Jerome Martin >>> <jxm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> Would it be better for the distro maintainers to instead have a >>> tarball generated without the RPM specfile, debian subdirectory and >>> packaging targets (no Makefile), but instead just plain (versioned) >>> sources and the setup.py as official upstream release means ? If so, I >>> would just add along a "tarball" target to the existing Makefile and >>> be done with it faster. >> >> Yes, please. In fact, quilt and deb src format 3.0 strip them off. > > OK. I suspected it would be more convenient for debian. > Let's wait for Andy to chime in regarding preferred upstream tarball > format for RHEL/Fedora too. Yes this is preferable for me, too. Regards -- Andy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe target-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
