On Tue, 20 Sep 2011 09:04:00 +0300 Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 1:38 AM, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> > Finally, the name is poor. __It starts with "unpack_", so it belongs to
> >> > the "unpack" subsystem. __There's no such thing. __Something like
> >> > hex_byte_to_bin() would be better.
> >>
> >> agreed. __It was suppose to parallel the existing pack_hex_byte().
> >
> > hex_byte_pack() :)
> Have you just proposed to do mass rename of pack_hex_byte() to the
> hex_byte_pack()?
It's very minor, but I suppose we should, if someone feels like it.
We should retain a
char * __deprecated pack_hex_byte(char *buf, u8 byte)
{
return hex_byte_pack(buf, byte);
}
for a few cycles to minimise harm to out-of-tree code.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe target-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
