Re: (solved) Re: How to chain services driven by a timer?

[Brian Reichert <reichert@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 09:23:29AM -0600, Dan Nicholson wrote:
> Since you likely don't have any units that depend on your service it
> likely doesn't make a big difference. To demonstrate, here's a stupid
> service I created:
> 
> # cat /etc/systemd/system/foo.service
> [Service]
> Type=oneshot
> ExecStart=/bin/echo foo
> 
> With Type=oneshot, the journal output looks like this:
> 
> Apr 17 15:02:50 endless systemd[1]: Starting foo.service...
> Apr 17 15:02:50 endless echo[5390]: foo
> Apr 17 15:02:50 endless systemd[1]: foo.service: Deactivated successfully.
> Apr 17 15:02:50 endless systemd[1]: Finished foo.service.
> 
> With Type=simple, the journal output looks like this:
> 
> Apr 17 14:55:23 endless systemd[1]: Started foo.service.
> Apr 17 14:55:23 endless echo[4482]: foo
> Apr 17 14:55:23 endless systemd[1]: foo.service: Deactivated successfully.
> 
> Notice that in the oneshot case it doesn't reach Finished until after
> Deactivated. In the simple case, it immediately goes into Started. If
> I had a unit with After=foo.service, it would be started before
> foo.service actually did anything if it had Type=simple.
> 
> Of more interest to you is logrotate.service, which is Type=oneshot.

(Confirmed, it is.)

> If it was Type=simple, your unit would be started before the logrotate
> command completed, which is probably not what you want.

Thanks for all of the succint details!  I'm incorporating your advice.

-- 
Brian Reichert				<reichert@xxxxxxxxxxx>
BSD admin/developer at large