On Sa, 02.09.23 22:22, Aleksandar Kostadinov (akostadi@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > Looking at the PR [1] it looks like I need to do a lot of things at > each update manually. Is the thing in the comment the only thing I > need to do or are there other things as well? There's nowadays "ukify" that does all of this for you in one relatively easy step, it's our recommended approach to building UKIs these days. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering, Berlin
Re: Fedora 38 and signed PCR binding
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Fedora 38 and signed PCR binding
- From: Lennart Poettering <lennart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2023 12:20:10 +0200
- Cc: Systemd <systemd-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <CAPws7kZ4funXLTn-43C5RtVuEWW+ujxshwEUsD_33pDyZCiq2w@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CAPws7kav07bXBfyk6Ad=j9fNEKmAg8X50yuwykaP_h3ObruYqQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAPws7kZ4funXLTn-43C5RtVuEWW+ujxshwEUsD_33pDyZCiq2w@mail.gmail.com>
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Fedora 38 and signed PCR binding
- From: Aleksandar Kostadinov
- Re: Fedora 38 and signed PCR binding
- References:
- Fedora 38 and signed PCR binding
- From: Aleksandar Kostadinov
- Re: Fedora 38 and signed PCR binding
- From: Aleksandar Kostadinov
- Fedora 38 and signed PCR binding
- Prev by Date: Re: Fedora 38 and signed PCR binding
- Next by Date: Re: Assertion '!ether_addr_is_null(addr)'
- Previous by thread: Re: Fedora 38 and signed PCR binding
- Next by thread: Re: Fedora 38 and signed PCR binding
- Index(es):
 |