On Mi, 11.01.23 13:31, Lennart Poettering (lennart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > On Mi, 11.01.23 11:53, Joshua Zivkovic (joshua.zivkovic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > I've been working on adding JSON and table output to `systemd-analyze > > plot`, to allow programmatic access to the data presented in the SVG > > produced by `systemd-analyze plot`. Whilst using this data I have > > noticed some irregularities in the initialisation times associated with > > a variety of units. It seems as though these units are being activated, > > deactivated and then reactivated because they have recorded > > deactivation times that are before the recorded activation time. > > > > Looking at some of these units, they don't use the `Restart=` > > configuration so it's unusual that they are seemingly being restarted. > > > > These irregularities are dealt with by forcing the values to some other > > recorded value of that unit through a series of conditions in the SVG > > production code. > > > > I'm interested in whether this means that the times for unit > > initialisation, presented by `plot`, aren't entirely accurate and if > > there is anything that can be done about this. > > You should read them with a grain of salt. And you should only run the > tool shortly after booting (i.e. where there's a reasonably chance no > service has been restarted yet). If you do it later then the data is > going to be garbage because of the discrepancy between what we > actually track (startup time of most recent invocation) to what people > might expect (startup time of first invocation). > > Also note that services that are not referenced by anything (and > didn't fail) might have been unloaded (i.e. "GC'ed"), which means > their startup timing info is released and won't show up in the > displayed data either. I added some explanatory docs for this now, in this PR: https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/26019 ptal Lennart -- Lennart Poettering, Berlin