|
Hi Michael,
> Unfortunately not. You'd need some kind of "maintenance" mode ... Thanks a lot. I will go with the maintenance mode without fearing to have missed some systemd feature.
Cheers,
Klaus
|
Re: Is it possible to let systemd create a listening socket and yet be able to have that socket activate nothing, at least temporarily?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Is it possible to let systemd create a listening socket and yet be able to have that socket activate nothing, at least temporarily?
- From: Klaus Ebbe Grue <grue@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2022 07:58:54 +0000
- Accept-language: da-DK, en-US
- In-reply-to: <CAGWsdOhkY0dwKE2MSL9=cmF85sGrMen5JFWQLsHeFuY2i_y=Tw@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <91a90e97f41a4da3b7f716727262de84@di.ku.dk>, <CAGWsdOhkY0dwKE2MSL9=cmF85sGrMen5JFWQLsHeFuY2i_y=Tw@mail.gmail.com>
- References:
- Is it possible to let systemd create a listening socket and yet be able to have that socket activate nothing, at least temporarily?
- From: Klaus Ebbe Grue
- Re: Is it possible to let systemd create a listening socket and yet be able to have that socket activate nothing, at least temporarily?
- From: Michael Biebl
- Is it possible to let systemd create a listening socket and yet be able to have that socket activate nothing, at least temporarily?
- Prev by Date: Re: Is it possible to let systemd create a listening socket and yet be able to have that socket activate nothing, at least temporarily?
- Next by Date: Re: Is it possible to let systemd create a listening socket and yet be able to have that socket activate nothing, at least temporarily?
- Previous by thread: Re: Is it possible to let systemd create a listening socket and yet be able to have that socket activate nothing, at least temporarily?
- Next by thread: Re: Is it possible to let systemd create a listening socket and yet be able to have that socket activate nothing, at least temporarily?
- Index(es):
 |