>>> Lennart Poettering <mzerqung@xxxxxxxxxxx> schrieb am 22.07.2022 um 12:15 in Nachricht <Ytp4phEdreAJAdpl@gardel-login>: > On Do, 21.07.22 16:24, Stéphane Graber (stgraber@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > >> Hey there, >> >> I believe Christian may have relayed some of this already but on my >> side, as much as I can sympathize with the annoyance of having to >> support both cgroup1 and cgroup2 side by side, I feel that we're sadly >> nowhere near the cut off point. >> >> >From what I can gather from various stats we have, over 90% of LXD >> users are still on distributions relying on CGroup1. >> That's because most of them are using LTS releases of server >> distributions and those only somewhat recently made the jump to >> cgroup2: >> ‑ RHEL 9 in May 2022 >> ‑ Ubuntu 22.04 LTS in April 2022 >> ‑ Debian 11 in August 2021 >> >> OpenSUSE is still on cgroup1 by default in 15.4 for some reason. >> All this is also excluding our two largest users, Chromebooks and QNAP >> NASes, neither of them made the switch yet. > > At some point I feel no sympathy there. If google/qnap/suse still are > stuck in cgroupv1 land, then that's on them, we shouldn't allow > ourselves to be held hostage by that. > > I mean, that Google isn't forward looking in these things is well > known, but I am a bit surprised SUSE is still so far back. Well, openSUSE actually is rather equivalent to SLES15 (which exists for some years now). I guess they didn't want to switch within a major release. Everybody is free to file an "enhancement" request, at opensuse's bugzilla, however. ... Regards, Ulrich