On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 5:03 PM Barry <barry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > To be robust why not make the services recover from network issues? > Then you do not need to care about the routes. > Of course you will need to know if services have outages. > > Even if a route was working at some point what do you do if the route > goes down later? While I would love to do that, the services in question aren't my code, and I can't easily/quickly change their behavior. At the moment I have systemd setup to allow them to restart a large number of times so that they'll eventually start up and connect, and of course if they fail during operation they'll get restarted too. I want to wait for the routes just to improve the elegance of the installation, not its function :-)