Hey, I've been working on my small seedrng utility, which is more or less the same thing as systemd-random-seed.service, with a few unimportant design differences here and there. As I'd worked with systemd-random-seed.service quite a bit before, its choices comprised much of my mental model starting out. One of the things I did like systemd-random-seed.service without really thinking too much about it is I made use of /var/lib/seedrng/, just as systemd uses /var/lib/systemd/random-seed/. Seems reasonable enough I guess. But I was thinking: wouldn't /var/cache/{blah}/ be the better for this? Seeds are supposed to be somewhat volatile, and shouldn't be copied between images, and the default behavior of /var/lib is usually to be copied, whereas /var/cache usually isn't. There's also /var/tmp too, right? Which is supposed to be never a tmpfs or something? But "cache" seems a bit more fitting than "temporary". Anyway, I'm not really sure what makes the most sense, and it seems like FHS placement is more of an art than a science. I don't think I'm super far off, though, in at least wondering whether random seeds belong in /var/cache rather than /var/lib. Does anybody have opinions on this? Should I just submit a PR moving the systemd seeds to /var/cache and see what happens? Jason