>>> Mantas Mikulenas <grawity@xxxxxxxxx> schrieb am 27.04.2022 um 12:03 in Nachricht <CAPWNY8XO0tu6EdpJO538qyGBJ0kOmZo5iCaoJpPc8kt4QZ+vXg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 10:09 AM Ulrich Windl < > Ulrich.Windl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Hi! >> >> Having written an RFC 3164 compatible syslog daemon, I noticed that systemd >> created syslog messages with non-ASCII characters. >> The problem is that a remote syslogd can hardly guess the correct character >> set (I'm using rsyslog to forward local messages to a remote server). >> >> Example of such message: >> systemd-tmpfiles[3311]: [/usr/lib/tmpfiles.d/svnserve.conf:1] Line >> references >> path below legacy directory /var/run/, updating /var/run/svnserve → >> /run/svnserve; please update the tmpfiles.d/ drop-in file accordingly. >> >> (The arrow is encoded as three bytes (\xe2\x86\x92)) >> >> RFC 5425 syslog messages require the use of a BOM (%xEF.BB.BF) at the >> beginning of a message if the message used UTF-8: >> >> MSG = MSG-ANY / MSG-UTF8 >> MSG-ANY = *OCTET ; not starting with BOM >> MSG-UTF8 = BOM UTF-8-STRING >> BOM = %xEF.BB.BF >> >> Wouldn't it make sense to add such a BOM for RFC 3164 syslog messages also >> if >> non-ASCII (i.e.: UTF-8) encoded characters are used? >> > > RFC 3164 over a local socket from journald to local rsyslogd? The local Actually I wasn't quite sure about the default config in SLES12. It seems the flow is journald -> local rsyslogd -> remote syslogd > rsyslogd already knows if messages are UTF-8 because the system's $LANG > (well, nl_langinfo) says so. And if rsyslog can't trust that for some > reason (e.g. because a user might have a different locale), then > systemd-journald won't be able to trust it either, so it won't know whether > it could add the BOM. How could a remote syslog server know what the locale on the sending system is? > > RFC 3164 over the network to a remote server? Outside the scope for > systemd, since it doesn't generate the network packets; your local rsyslogd > forwarder does. (Also, why RFC 3164 and not 5425?) If you look outside the world of systemd, about 99% of systems create the RFC 3164 type of messages. Some may send non-ASCII too, however. > > Generally, if a message successfully decodes as UTF-8 then it's most likely > actual UTF-8 (and if UTF-8 decode fails then you fall back to ISO8859-1). > Various old systems get away with this without needing a UTF-8 BOM. Yes, you can just output what you received, hoping the messages will be presented correctly. I't just like sending 8-bit E-Mmail without a coding system or charset in the past. Regards, Ulrich