Re: Splitting sd-boot from systemd/bootctl for enabling sd-boot in Fedora

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am Mi., 27. Apr. 2022 um 17:16 Uhr schrieb Dan Nicholson <dbn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 9:01 AM Michael Biebl <mbiebl@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Slightly related
> > https://salsa.debian.org/systemd-team/systemd/-/merge_requests/138
> > [sd-boot split]
> > https://salsa.debian.org/systemd-team/systemd/-/merge_requests/132
> > [Draft: Prepare for EFI signing]
>
> Oh, nice. We've been signing sd-boot in Endless for a couple years now
> with our systemd package based on Debian's. Currently the entire
> systemd package is sent through the signing flow just for sd-boot.
> When sd-boot is a separate package that can be much simpler with the
> normal non-sd-boot targets unaffected.


This discussion  might be relevant to  you then
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=996202

Automatically signing sd-boot in Debian was rejected by Julian Andres Klode



[Index of Archives]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Photo]

  Powered by Linux