On Thu, 2022-03-24 at 09:38 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Mi, 23.03.22 11:28, Luca Boccassi (bluca@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > > > At least according to our documentation it wouldn't save us much > > anyway, as the biggest leap is taking cgroupv2 for granted, which > > requires 4.1, so it's included regardless. Unless there's something > > undocumented that would make a big difference, in practical terms of > > maintainability? > > Note that "cgroupv2 exists" and "cgroupv2 works well" are two distinct > things. Initially too few controllers supported cgroupv2 for cgroupv2 > to be actually useful. > > What I am trying to say is that it would actually help us a lot if > we'd not just be able to take croupv2 for granted but to take a > reasonably complete cgroupv2 for granted. > > Lennart > > -- > Lennart Poettering, Berlin Yes, that does sound like worth exploring - our README doesn't document it though, do we have a list of required controllers and when they were introduced? -- Kind regards, Luca Boccassi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
