Antw: [EXT] Re: version bump of minimal kernel version supported by systemd?

["Ulrich Windl" <Ulrich.Windl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

>>> Dave Howorth <systemd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> schrieb am 23.03.2022 um 23:34 in
Nachricht <20220323223400.569e09b2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> On Wed, 23 Mar 2022 22:26:15 +0100
> Michael Biebl <mbiebl@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Am Mi., 23. März 2022 um 22:11 Uhr schrieb Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
>> <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx>:
>> 
>> > Or in other words: I'd prefer for such people to speak up for
>> > themselves, rather than us trying to figure out what somebody else
>> > *might* be planning to do.  
>> 
>> That's laudable but keep in mind that users typically don't follow
>> systemd-devel actively. I'm pretty sure we don't even have
>> *maintainers* of embedded Linux following this mailing list.
> 
> I'm just a user and I follow this list. That is to say, it doesn't
> matter what typical users or maintainers do, it's enough if just one
> relevant person is following. It would be nice though, if there are any
> such people, if they would speak up and offer their opinion or say that
> they are going to take it to whichever manager/committee they need to.
> 
> FWIW, I think Greg was a bit too outspoken calling long maintenance
> attempts 'crazy'; that may have intimidated some. I'm thinking of
> moving distro to one that provides longer term maintenance than my
> present one. Although CIP is a completely different ball game; I hope
> they succeed.

Actually I think the audience of this list is irrelevant when the supported
configuration(s) are described in Release Notes and/or README/NEWS.

> 
> Cheers, Dave